Is it because these 9/11 widows have campaigned for an independent commission to investigate the attacks on the World Trade Center that Ann Coulter is so nasty to them?
Or all these vile comments just a planned scheme to make more money from her book?
Ann Coulter's vicious attack on four 9/11 widows has made us both mad. I (Sheri) don't think I can get us scheduled along with George Carlin and Ann on the "Tonight Show" this week, but we would sure like to give her a lesson in grief management.
These women are not "enjoying their husbands' deaths." They are doing what they should do and that is getting on with their lives after the death of their spouses.
For those of you unaware of Coulter's hurtful remarks, here is a quote from her book:
"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much."
In an interview on Fox News Coulter is said to have referred to the widows as "harpies" whose husbands were planning on divorce.
She’s a despicable publicity hound. Since no one is crazy enough to marry her, she has no understanding of what it’s like to be in an enduring, committed relationship or experience the loss of such. She doesn’t deserve to sell one book or be on TV anymore; she promotes hatred and thrives on inflicting pain. What a witch!
Coulter’s comments in this most recent book are so vitriolic that I no longer watch the shows which have given her a forum to spew her hatred.
“Is it because these 9/11 widows have campaigned for an independent commission to investigate the attacks on the World Trade Center that Ann Coulter is so nasty to them?”
ACtually, I think it was because desoite their overwhelming grief, they managed to do campaign ads for John Kerry.
Furthermore, Coulter’s point in her book was that the 9/11 commission was far from “independent”, but rather little more than a forum for the democrats to attack the President, complete with their own cheering section of 9/11 widows who would hail them as heroes in their morning talk show rounds every day.
I feel for the loss of ALL family members of 9/11 victims. But I won’t allow them to use their grief as a weapon against me. These broads are doing campaign ads for John Kerry, but we aren’t allowed to respond to it because their husbands are dead? Sorry if I don’t play that game.
Rather blindly, Bob and Sheri Stritof are the ones being vicious, to Ann Coulter, who properly calls out the Jersey Girls for enjoying their celebrity status as a result of 9/11. Their push for the commission turned into a whitewash of Clinton’s incompetent conduct regarding national security. One commission member, Jamie Gorelick, architected the disastrous policy which led to 9/11, so Coulter was right in saying, “Mostly the Witches of East Brunswick wanted George Bush to apologize for not being Bill Clinton.” Additionally, look at their appearances in the tabloids and their cutting campaign commericals for Kerry!
And these vicious writers say Miss Coulter is mean? Ann sounds innocent compared to this vitriol from the Stritofs, but from what people have said who have personally met her, Ann is a very nice and gracious person. Also this is not a money scheme, she believes what she believes and writes and doesn’t compromise, and like other liberals the Stritofs have no clue as to the complete condemnation of liberalism presented in Godless. They just go hysterical because Ann points people out for what they are.
By the way, last night in the bookstore I saw a new book by Kristen Breitweiser called Wake-Up Call, and most mockingly, it was placed alongside Miss Coulter’s book. Talk about an extremely vicious harpie enjoying her celebrity status! Even worse, her afterword is “A Letter to Ann Coulter.” How far will she and her other fellow harpies go?